Both are full-featured DAWs for Windows and macOS, but they were designed around opposite center points: FL Studio (Image-Line) builds outward from patterns and loops, while Studio One 7 (built by PreSonus, now sold as Fender Studio Pro) builds outward from the multitrack timeline. Producers compare them because they sit on opposite ends of the same question: do you make beats, or do you record and mix songs?
Decisive signal
The decisive split is architecture, not feature count. FL Studio is pattern-first: you write short loops in the Step Sequencer and piano roll, then paint them as blocks in the Playlist, which is why it turns a groove into a track faster than almost anything else. Studio One is timeline-first: a single-window, drag-and-drop session built for recording performances, comping takes, and moving audio around, and it adds a dedicated Project page that gives you a real mastering environment most DAWs make you bolt on separately. FL's piano roll is widely considered best in class; Studio One's ARA/Melodyne integration and mastering page are its equivalent standout. Everything else about value and workflow flows from that one difference in where each app expects the music to start.
Choose FL Studio if
The producer whose music is built from loops, patterns, and electronic sound design, and who never wants to pay for another upgrade.
Open plugin file →Choose Studio One 7 if
The songwriter or engineer who records live audio, comps takes, tunes vocals with Melodyne, and wants a built-in mastering page.
Open plugin file →